—
C+
C+ The full Closelooknet — membership. Open the C+ overview

Verallia (VRLA.PA) — Quality & forensics

As of 2026-10-06 — refreshed nightly. Closelooknet readings from an investment research diary, not ratings or advice.

The Closelooknet module scores

39 /100 composite · 7 modules · general weight set

Scores are computed nightly across the coverage universe and read relative to it — the methodology lives in the company-scoring explainer.

Financial forensics — the academic screens

1.58 Altman Z-Score

Sits in the distress zone (below 1.81). The Z-Score estimates financial-distress risk from five balance-sheet and earnings ratios.

5/9 Piotroski F-Score

Nine binary fundamental-strength checks across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency.

-2.96 Beneish M-Score

Screens reported earnings for statistical manipulation patterns — below the −1.78 manipulation-risk threshold. A screen, not an accusation.

Continue: the VRLA.PA chart & overview

FAQ · from the current data · as of 2026-10-06

Quick answers

What is Verallia's Closelooknet quality reading?

The composite reads 39/100 across 7 modules, as of 2026-10-06: valuation 78, quality 35, growth 15, balance sheet 28, cash quality 62, capital allocation 51, momentum 22. Closelooknet scores are research diary readings, not ratings or investment advice.

What is Verallia's Altman Z-Score?

1.58, which sits in the distress zone (below 1.81) as of 2026-10-06. The Altman Z-Score estimates financial distress risk from five balance-sheet and earnings ratios.

What is Verallia's Piotroski F-Score?

5 of 9, as of 2026-10-06. The F-Score counts nine binary fundamental-strength signals across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency.

What does Verallia's Beneish M-Score indicate?

-2.96 — below the −1.78 manipulation-risk threshold, as of 2026-10-06. The M-Score screens reported earnings for statistical manipulation patterns; it is a screen, not an accusation.

Related in the Closelooknet universe

then Packaging & Containers. Scored names rank on their Closelooknet score; names without one rank on trend state — above or below their 50- and 200-day averages — never on a score they do not carry.