Freedom Holding Corp (FRHC) — Quality & forensics

As of 2026-10-06 — refreshed nightly. Closelooknet readings from an investment research diary, not ratings or advice.

The Closelooknet module scores

44 /100 composite · 7 modules · general weight set

Valuation 39
Quality 57
Growth 47
Balance sheet 31
Cash quality 28
Capital allocation 22
Momentum 76

Scores are computed nightly across the coverage universe and read relative to it — the methodology lives in the company-scoring explainer.

Financial forensics — the academic screens

1.32 Altman Z-Score

Sits in the distress zone (below 1.81). The Z-Score estimates financial-distress risk from five balance-sheet and earnings ratios.

6/9 Piotroski F-Score

Nine binary fundamental-strength checks across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency.

-2.99 Beneish M-Score

Screens reported earnings for statistical manipulation patterns — below the −1.78 manipulation-risk threshold. A screen, not an accusation.

Continue: the FRHC chart & overview · the earnings record

FAQ · from the current data · as of 2026-10-06

Quick answers

What is Freedom Holding Corp's Closelooknet quality reading?

The composite reads 44/100 across 7 modules, as of 2026-10-06: valuation 39, quality 57, growth 47, balance sheet 31, cash quality 28, capital allocation 22, momentum 76. Closelooknet scores are research diary readings, not ratings or investment advice.

What is Freedom Holding Corp's Altman Z-Score?

1.32, which sits in the distress zone (below 1.81) as of 2026-10-06. The Altman Z-Score estimates financial distress risk from five balance-sheet and earnings ratios.

What is Freedom Holding Corp's Piotroski F-Score?

6 of 9, as of 2026-10-06. The F-Score counts nine binary fundamental-strength signals across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency.

What does Freedom Holding Corp's Beneish M-Score indicate?

-2.99 — below the −1.78 manipulation-risk threshold, as of 2026-10-06. The M-Score screens reported earnings for statistical manipulation patterns; it is a screen, not an accusation.

Related in the Closelooknet universe

then Financial Conglomerates, then Financial Services. Scored names rank on their Closelooknet score; names without one rank on trend state — above or below their 50- and 200-day averages — never on a score they do not carry.