—
C+
C+ The full Closelooknet — membership. Open the C+ overview

Aperam SA (APAM.AS) — Quality & forensics

As of 2026-10-06 — refreshed nightly. Closelooknet readings from an investment research diary, not ratings or advice.

The Closelooknet module scores

47 /100 composite · 7 modules · general weight set

Scores are computed nightly across the coverage universe and read relative to it — the methodology lives in the company-scoring explainer.

Financial forensics — the academic screens

2.48 Altman Z-Score

Sits in the grey zone (1.81–2.99). The Z-Score estimates financial-distress risk from five balance-sheet and earnings ratios.

5/9 Piotroski F-Score

Nine binary fundamental-strength checks across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency.

-2.47 Beneish M-Score

Screens reported earnings for statistical manipulation patterns — below the −1.78 manipulation-risk threshold. A screen, not an accusation.

Continue: the APAM.AS chart & overview

FAQ · from the current data · as of 2026-10-06

Quick answers

What is Aperam SA's Closelooknet quality reading?

The composite reads 47/100 across 7 modules, as of 2026-10-06: valuation 70, quality 22, growth 54, balance sheet 32, cash quality 59, capital allocation 56, momentum 45. Closelooknet scores are research diary readings, not ratings or investment advice.

What is Aperam SA's Altman Z-Score?

2.48, which sits in the grey zone (1.81–2.99) as of 2026-10-06. The Altman Z-Score estimates financial distress risk from five balance-sheet and earnings ratios.

What is Aperam SA's Piotroski F-Score?

5 of 9, as of 2026-10-06. The F-Score counts nine binary fundamental-strength signals across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency.

What does Aperam SA's Beneish M-Score indicate?

-2.47 — below the −1.78 manipulation-risk threshold, as of 2026-10-06. The M-Score screens reported earnings for statistical manipulation patterns; it is a screen, not an accusation.

Related in the Closelooknet universe

then Steel, then Basic Materials. Scored names rank on their Closelooknet score; names without one rank on trend state — above or below their 50- and 200-day averages — never on a score they do not carry.